Fill out the on-line application
Fri, 14 Jul 2006
David Mcreynolds * dmcreynolds@nyc.rr.com
http://www.mytown.ca/mcreynolds/.
This current crisis flows not only from relatively old quarrels between Israel and the Palestinians, but from recent Israeli policy toward the Palestinians. When Hamas won the election in Palestine, one could deplore their refusal to recognize Israel, but one should not have been surprised by it, given the long policy of Israel of "targeted assassinations" which too often had high civilian casualties. (If one counts the number of Israelis killed by terrorists attacks and stacks those deaths up against the terrorist attacks by Israel on the Palestinians, the death rate is very much higher for the Palestinians - something the US media seems never to get clear).
One can feel a deep concern for the fear the Israelis have - I have that concern - but
After the remarkable beginning of the Iraq War, bitterly opposed by so many millions around the world, the gradual unraveling of the war became clearer. There were no weapons of mass destruction. Bush changed the rational for the invasion to one of "building democracy". One is curious as to what Bush will say, when he finally has to address the present reality - the war is lost, there will be no democracy, the lives and the money down a black hole.
For months the Republican line has consisted of three arguments (none of them addressing the issue of weapons of mass destruction). First, "while many can make critiques of past decisions, we must now 'stay the course'". (Ie., it is OK to talk about events in the past - but to challenge the current Bush policy was unpatriotic). Second, "whatever people thought about why we went in, we cannot now 'cut and run'", and the Democrats have not outlined what they propose as an alternative".Third, "if we don't fight the terrorists in Iraq, we will fight them here in our own country". As it turns out, the Democrats, who, aside from John Murtha, never did have a coherent plan for getting out, didn't need one. Because the US now doesn't have any choice.

Before I sleep tonight I must put aside the bills to pay, the chaos of my small lower east side studio apartment, and take some brief time dealing with page 16 of the New York Sunday Times of March 18.
Most of that page is taken up with charts and graphs. They reveal a chilling truth, one which almost all of us have known, but which the Administration has been denying, as it, on the one hand, tells us the "surge" is showing signs of success, and on the other hand, asking for still more troops.
Bush and his supporters are right about one thing - many of us hope for the failure of the "surge" because we hope for the failure of the entire dreadful US project in Iraq. We opposed it before it began, and we have fought against it every step of the way. It was a project based on imperial ambition, rooted in the desire to control the oil of that region, with no regard for international law, for the people of Iraq, or for our own troops. We have paid a terrible price already, in the slow bleeding of our image around the world, in the draining of funds needed here for housing, medical care, and education. We have become a nation known for Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, not for the Statue of Liberty or the Bill of Rights. The nation of Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, has become a nation led by thugs.
So yes, we were not hoping for the success of the "surge", not hoping that the vast new Embassy being built would survive, not hoping that the Green Zone would remain secure. We hoped for the defeat of the US military, even as we did not agree with the hideous culture of violence of the Sunni and Shiite forces which have killed more Iraqi civilians than American troops.

EdgeLeft: Grace Notes
Sun, 4 Nov 2007
by David McReynolds
Grace Paley died this August 22, at the age of 84, in her beloved Vermont, survived by her husband, Bob Nichols. Most of the world knows Grace for her writing, but to many of us in the peace movement she was at least as well known for being on the front line of actions.
This is a remembrance of Grace on two occasions, 1967, and 1971, small "grace notes" for a great woman.
In New York City, in 1967, War Resisters League had taken on the first day of a week-long series of actions aimed at closing the Whitehall Street Induction center. I found it amusing that the coalition of anti-war groups, which was not united on the concept of nonviolence, agreed to let the WRL take that first day for what was described as "traditional civil disobedience". (In theory I was in charge of organizing that event, though Maris Cakars did the major part of pulling the event together).
Maris and I were excited when we found Ben Spock had signed our list of people who would be there at 5 a.m. on December 5th. Neither of us wanted to call Spock to ask if he planned to join the civil disobedience or would be part of the larger "legal witness". Our fear was that Ben, who was known as a moderate sort of person, would withdraw entirely if he found out that arrests were planned. How groundless our fears - Ben led the way that day, and was among 264 folks arrested. It was, I believe, his first arrest.
Grace Paley was that rare "public intellectual" who both enriched the world by her writing and put herself on the front line, not once, but many times.
As we gathered in the darkness of pre-dawn I suggested to Grace Paley, whom I knew only as a key figure in the Greenwich Village Peace Center, that she and I take two groups of "non-celebrities" around to the rear of the Induction Center, and leave the front of the building for the celebrities. (Ah, it show how little I was keeping up with the field of literature, where Grace was already a celebrity).

We took our groups to the back, out of sight of the press. My own group - which was just out of sight of Grace's group - was quickly picked up by the police, tossed a few feet through the air, and arrested. But Grace's group, I later found out, had been charged by cops on horses, and several were injured, including Dr. Conor Cruise O'Brien and his wife. Grace had at once marched up to the officer in charge, grabbed him by the collar, and, shaking him like a misbehaving puppy, demanded he call off his men. Which he did.